SEUT Simulation Platform - Current State

Controls:

• Move between sprints (previous sprint data is preserved)
• Control phases within a sprint (new information reveal, engineering vote, discussion, stakeholder voting, score reveal)
• Player management: assign player role types and eject players from the session
• Full timer management
• Response management: remove sticky-note responses and votes on those responses
• Scorecard visibility toggle

1. Join as a player and choose a role
2. Vote in corporate choice and score points
3. Vote in head-to-head and score points
4. See private information (hidden motivations visible only to the assigned player)
5. Chat with participants
6. Submit sticky-note responses at any point during a sprint

1. Join as "Stakeholder" and choose a voter type
2. Vote in corporate choice and head-to-head
3. Score points individually when their vote matches the winning answer on corporate choice
4. Chat with participants
5. Submit and upvote sticky-note responses
6. System tracks scoring for stakeholder groups using the 2-of-3 rule: each group's internal majority determines its position, and if at least 2 of the 3 groups agree on an answer, that answer wins. Groups whose majority matches the winning answer earn a point.

The full Agile Ethics scoring system has been implemented. Currently the system tracks and displays on the scoreboard:

1. Engineers:

• Matched stakeholder group majority on corporate choice (1 point per sprint)
• Won head-to-head stakeholder vote (1 point in their designated sprint)

2. Stakeholders (individual):

• Individual vote matched winning answer on corporate choice

3. Stakeholder Groups:

• Group majority matched winning answer on corporate choice

Responses are short text submissions (sticky notes) that any participant, engineer or stakeholder, can post at any point during a sprint. Other participants can upvote responses to signal agreement. Upvotes have no effect on scoring; they are used purely for discussion and visibility.

1. Scenario metadata (ID, title, description, enabled toggle, waiting room and facilitator messages)
2. Global and per-sprint configurable timers
3. Voter types defining external evaluator perspectives
4. Player roles with public descriptions and hidden private motivations
5. Ordered sprints with narrative framing
6. Corporate choice: binary group vote on a strategic question
7. Head-to-head: two roles debate, group votes on the winner
8. Rotating head-to-head pairings across sprints
9. All choices are binary (exactly two options per question)